I just finished "Dr. Mary's Monkey," a book by Edward T. Haslam reviewed in last week's Gambit Weekly about the links between the unsolved murder of a famed cancer scientist in July of 1964 (on the 21st, as it happened; exactly 43 years ago yesterday), dangerous top-secret virus research, Lee Harvey Oswald, and the conspiracies to kill Castro (unsuccessful) and Kennedy (successful).
For a better review than I can give here, check out the Gambit's article. I'll avoid too much narration here, but in brief, the tale is that, in the '50s, millions of schoolchildren were vaccinated against polio; the vaccine used for this massive public health initiative was tainted with monkey viruses, some of which caused cancer in laboratory animals; doctors at the newly-formed Tulane hospital were recruited to discover a cure for the accidentally-induced cancers; meanwhile, powerful forces were trying to find a way to assassinate Fidel Castro by using these fatal viruses, and in the course of this, famous New Orleans doctor Mary Sherman was found murdered and partially incinerated in her apartment. Lee Harvey Oswald (photo) was drawn into the secret laboratory where research on mice was done; he later fell from this position and wound up in Dallas, 1964, and the rest is history (at least, that's one side of the story).
The book is as much a roller-coaster ride as you'd expect. Published by a conspiracy-minded publishing house in Oregon, the book has all the sloppy argumentation you'd expect from any conspiracy rant, and the author engages in the time honored conspiracist tradition of constructing a fragile framework of facts, interlinked by a web of assumptions that range from the conceivable to the extreme, and presenting this framework as a grand unified theory of truth.
That's not to say that, in Mr. Haslam's case, his work is little more than a simmering cauldron of tantalizing mysteries and bizarre serendipity. His research is good, persisent if nothing else, and it should be easy enough to fact check much of what he says. At times, though, the research gives way to speculation; speculation that is later elevated to assumption, and from there on to truth.
If his facts are all correct, there is no need for such murky speculations. It's not necessary to embellish or downplay weaknesses in the story. It's pretty compelling, and it reads well, and even if what Haslam believes to be true is not, there is still a great mystery behind the odd characters and wierd interactions that went on behind closed doors here, over forty years ago.
I love good, seemingly air-tight conspiracy theories. But just because I like such theories doesn't mean I invest myself in their truth or falsity. Conspiracy theorists are notorious for discounting criticisms of their work as part of the conspiracy itself (this is something that separates them from historians, whose work is generally ignored but who can afford to be a little more rigorous in addressing their critics). Personally, even though the writing style is overly familiar and a bit unsophisticated, I recommend reading the book. I'd hate for the tale to be true, but if it's even if it's exaggerated, that still leaves an unsolved murder, a problematic polio virus, a sudden epidemic of cancers (not to mention AIDS/HIV), and odd connections between Lee Harvey Oswald, virus research, and Dr. Alton Ochsner. Keep a grain of salt close at hand, though.
Well, maybe a shaker of salt...